a kin’ o’ librarian

Libraries, of course, imply the presence of librarians—those wonderful, towering people we learn to hold in a sort of terrified awe as children, and continue to do so after we’re grown-ups.

We’ve been presenting some of MacDonald’s ideas about libraries this week, so it seems about time to meet one of his librarians. Mr Cupples stands not only as one of MacDonald’s greatest characters, I would argue that he is one of the greatest, most colourful characters of English (and Scottish) literature. He is a kind of librarian—sort of. Or he could be.

Here is one of the few times we actually meet Mr Cupples in the library, instead over toddy in his flat. I make no apologies for the un-translated Scots. The flavour and authenticity is worth persevering through the difficult passages (for English language readers).

Those readers who have met Mr Cupples before will know how much the image or idea of the library shapes the character. And they will understand why I was nearly moved to tears when at last he goes flying kites.

Read and discuss.

“But,” said Alec, “what is Mr Cupples?”

“That’s a queston he cudna weel answer ye himsel’,” was [his landlady’s] reply. “He does a heap o’ things; writes for the lawyers whiles; buys and sells queer buiks; gies lessons in Greek and Hebrew—but he disna like that—he canna bide to be contred, and laddies is gey contresome; helps onybody that wants help i’ the way o’ figures—whan their buiks gang wrang ye ken, for figures is some ill for jummlin’. He’s a kin’ o’ librarian at yer ain college i’ the noo, Mr Forbes. The auld man’s deid, and Mr Cupples is jist doin’ the wark. They winna gie him the place—’cause he has an ill name for drink—but they’ll get as muckle wark oot o’ him as gin they did, and for half the siller. The body hauds at onythiug weel eneuch a’ day, but the minute he comes hame, oot comes the tappit hen, and he jist sits doon and drinks till he turns the warl upo’ the tap o’ ‘m.”

The next day, about noon, Alec went into the library, where he found Mr Cupples busy re-arranging the books and the catalogue, both of which had been neglected for years. This was the first of many visits to the library, or rather to the librarian.

There was a certain mazy sobriety of demeanour about Mr Cupples all day long, as if in the presence of such serious things as books he was bound to be upon his good behaviour, and confine his dissipation to taking snuff in prodigious quantities. He was full of information about books, and had, besides, opinions concerning them, which were always ready to assume quaint and decided expression. For instance: one afternoon, Alec having taken up Tristram Shandy and asked him what kind of a book it was, the pro-librarian snatched it from his hands and put it on the shelf again, answering:

“A pailace o’ dirt and impidence and speeeritual stink. The clever deevil had his entrails in his breest and his hert in his belly, and regairdet neither God nor his ain mither. His lauchter’s no like the cracklin’ o’ thorns unner a pot, but like the nicherin’ o’ a deil ahin’ the wainscot. Lat him sit and rot there!”

Asking him another day what sort of poet Shelley was, Alec received the answer:

“A bonny cratur, wi’ mair thochts nor there was room for i’ the bit heid o’ ‘m. Consequently he gaed staiggerin’ aboot as gin he had been tied to the tail o’ an inveesible balloon. Unco licht heidit, but no muckle hairm in him by natur’.”

He never would remain in the library after the day began to ebb. The moment he became aware that the first filmy shadow had fallen from the coming twilight, he caught up his hat, locked the door, gave the key to the sacrist, and hurried away.

The friendly relation between the two struck its roots deeper and deeper during the session, and Alec bade him good-bye with regret.

Mr Cupples was a baffled poet trying to be a humourist—baffled—not by the booksellers or the public—for such baffling one need not have a profound sympathy—but baffled by his own weakness, his incapacity for assimilating sorrow, his inability to find or invent a theory of the universe which should show it still beautiful despite of passing pain, of checked aspiration, of the ruthless storms that lay waste the Edens of men, and dissolve the high triumph of their rainbows. He had yet to learn that through “the heartache and the thousand natural shocks that flesh is heir to,” man becomes capable of the blessedness to which all the legends of a golden age point. Not finding, when he most needed it, such a theory even in the New Testament—for he had been diligently taught to read it awry—Mr Cupples took to jesting and toddy; but, haunting the doors of Humour, never got further than the lobby.

(Alec Forbes of Howglen, ch. XXXIX, 1865)

Advertisements

3 thoughts on “a kin’ o’ librarian

  1. For the record, as one of the resident librarian-commenters here, I am thrilled about all the library-related posts this week. But, because it is a travel week for me, and I am in business meetings for 2 days straight, I have yet to read them and offer my thoughts, whatever they might be worth. I promise I will read and comment soon though, and that the posts were not lost on me. *proceeds to mark this post as “unread” in Google Reader*

  2. Golly, I love MacDonald. That is beautiful. I don’t think I’ve ever read that book… merciful goodness, that last paragraph amazes me. Character development, sermon, heartache and rousing of sympathy all wrapped up in a few lines of narrative. Heck, he’s even telling instead of showing. And it’s brilliant.

    I love the way Mr. Cupples knows and describes the books and authors. One of the most thrilling conversations I ever had with a teenager (at least, since leaving the teen years myself) happened with a young girl who worked re-shelving books. I still need to read some of the books she told me about, though her favorite–Inkheart–has now become one I love as well.

  3. I LOVE Mr. Cupples, but am always so sad for him. I read this book a few months ago. Again. And fell in love with Alec Forbes. Again. But we’re talking about Mr. Cupples, here, so…

    Wow, that Scottish is amazing! I’ve only read Michael Phillips’ edited versions of these novels, and he brings it down a notch (or ten), so it took me a bit longer to get through the dialogue this time. Reading that last paragraph reminds me how much I can – if I can at all – relate to Mr. Cupples. I think MacDonald knows too well the heart of every poet, and that reconciliation of pain and beauty that baffles us all.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s